(trimming receipients)

Dale, are we good, or do we need to go through another iteration?

Kind regards,

Job

On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 06:28:11PM -0400, Hankins, Greg (Nokia - US) wrote:
> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 04:29:06PM -0400, Dale R. Worley wrote:
> >I suspect my problems come from not realizing there has been a change of
> >focus.  (It may be much clearer to routing people.)  So I would suggest
> >expanding the title of Appendix A to "Transition Considerations for
> >Vendors of BGP Implementations".
> 
> Hi Dale, how about simply "Transition Considerations for BGP Implementers" as
> there are many excellent FOSS implementations in addition to implementations
> sold by vendors?
> 
> >    For an implementer, transitioning to a compliant BGP implementation
> >    may require a software development and release process that can take
> >    several years.
> >
> >Perhaps "a software development and release" can be omitted.
> 
> Updated: For an implementer, transitioning to a compliant BGP implementation
> may require a process that can take several years.
> 
> >> This document updates [RFC4271] so that routes are neither imported nor
> >> exported unless specifically enabled by configuration.  The solution
> >> reduces the consequences of these problems, and improves the default level
> >> of Internet routing security.
> >
> >In that case, I'd start the second sentence with "This change ..." or
> >perhaps "This update ..." -- nothing has previously been labeled a
> >"solution", so the reader has to search a bit to determine the
> >antecedent.
> 
> Updated: This change reduces the consequences of these problems, and improves
> the default level of Internet routing security.
> 
> We'll wait to send a new diff in case there are further comments.
> 
> Kind regards,
> Greg
> 
> --
> Greg Hankins <[email protected]>
> Senior Product Manager
> IP/Optical Networks, Nokia
> 
> _______________________________________________
> GROW mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to