done! On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 5:55 PM, Warren Kumari <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 6:35 PM, Job Snijders <[email protected]> wrote: >> (trimming receipients) >> >> Dale, are we good, or do we need to go through another iteration? > > I'm not Dale, but it sounds to me like there is agreement, so upload a > new version. > > I think that the new text improves the document, thanks for the review! > W > >> >> Kind regards, >> >> Job >> >> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 06:28:11PM -0400, Hankins, Greg (Nokia - US) wrote: >>> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 04:29:06PM -0400, Dale R. Worley wrote: >>> >I suspect my problems come from not realizing there has been a change of >>> >focus. (It may be much clearer to routing people.) So I would suggest >>> >expanding the title of Appendix A to "Transition Considerations for >>> >Vendors of BGP Implementations". >>> >>> Hi Dale, how about simply "Transition Considerations for BGP Implementers" >>> as >>> there are many excellent FOSS implementations in addition to implementations >>> sold by vendors? >>> >>> > For an implementer, transitioning to a compliant BGP implementation >>> > may require a software development and release process that can take >>> > several years. >>> > >>> >Perhaps "a software development and release" can be omitted. >>> >>> Updated: For an implementer, transitioning to a compliant BGP implementation >>> may require a process that can take several years. >>> >>> >> This document updates [RFC4271] so that routes are neither imported nor >>> >> exported unless specifically enabled by configuration. The solution >>> >> reduces the consequences of these problems, and improves the default >>> >> level >>> >> of Internet routing security. >>> > >>> >In that case, I'd start the second sentence with "This change ..." or >>> >perhaps "This update ..." -- nothing has previously been labeled a >>> >"solution", so the reader has to search a bit to determine the >>> >antecedent. >>> >>> Updated: This change reduces the consequences of these problems, and >>> improves >>> the default level of Internet routing security. >>> >>> We'll wait to send a new diff in case there are further comments. >>> >>> Kind regards, >>> Greg >>> >>> -- >>> Greg Hankins <[email protected]> >>> Senior Product Manager >>> IP/Optical Networks, Nokia >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> GROW mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow > > > > -- > I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad > idea in the first place. > This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing > regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair > of pants. > ---maf
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
