On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 6:35 PM, Job Snijders <[email protected]> wrote: > (trimming receipients) > > Dale, are we good, or do we need to go through another iteration?
I'm not Dale, but it sounds to me like there is agreement, so upload a new version. I think that the new text improves the document, thanks for the review! W > > Kind regards, > > Job > > On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 06:28:11PM -0400, Hankins, Greg (Nokia - US) wrote: >> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 04:29:06PM -0400, Dale R. Worley wrote: >> >I suspect my problems come from not realizing there has been a change of >> >focus. (It may be much clearer to routing people.) So I would suggest >> >expanding the title of Appendix A to "Transition Considerations for >> >Vendors of BGP Implementations". >> >> Hi Dale, how about simply "Transition Considerations for BGP Implementers" as >> there are many excellent FOSS implementations in addition to implementations >> sold by vendors? >> >> > For an implementer, transitioning to a compliant BGP implementation >> > may require a software development and release process that can take >> > several years. >> > >> >Perhaps "a software development and release" can be omitted. >> >> Updated: For an implementer, transitioning to a compliant BGP implementation >> may require a process that can take several years. >> >> >> This document updates [RFC4271] so that routes are neither imported nor >> >> exported unless specifically enabled by configuration. The solution >> >> reduces the consequences of these problems, and improves the default level >> >> of Internet routing security. >> > >> >In that case, I'd start the second sentence with "This change ..." or >> >perhaps "This update ..." -- nothing has previously been labeled a >> >"solution", so the reader has to search a bit to determine the >> >antecedent. >> >> Updated: This change reduces the consequences of these problems, and improves >> the default level of Internet routing security. >> >> We'll wait to send a new diff in case there are further comments. >> >> Kind regards, >> Greg >> >> -- >> Greg Hankins <[email protected]> >> Senior Product Manager >> IP/Optical Networks, Nokia >> >> _______________________________________________ >> GROW mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow -- I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in the first place. This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of pants. ---maf _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
