Hi Michael, Please see inline.
>> On 4. Jun 2018, at 05:17, Christer Holmberg >><[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> Re-sent due to wrong e-mail address. >> >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I have also looked at this document, and there are things that I have >>> think are unclear: >>> >>> Q1: It is Informational, and it does not update RFC 4960. Instead, it >>>just >>> seems to list the erratas (but without even referencing them, as noted >>>by >>> Paul). I think that it should be made very clear that this document is >>> only for guidance, and that implementers shall use the actual erratas >>>for >>> the actual updates. >Please note that the documents covers the following processed erratas and >also mentions this: > >* >https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-errata-06#section-3.1 > covers Errata ID 1440. >* >https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-errata-06#section-3.2 > covers Errata ID 1574. >* >https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-errata-06#section-3.3 > covers Errata ID 2592. >* >https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-errata-06#section-3.4 > covers Errata ID 3291 and Errata ID 3804. >* >https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-errata-06#section-3.5 > covers Errata ID 3423. >* >https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-errata-06#section-3.6 > covers Errata ID 3788. >* >https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-errata-06#section-3.7 > covers Errata ID 4071. >* >https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-errata-06#section-3.8 > covers Errata ID 4400. >* >https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-errata-06#section-3.9 > covers Errata ID 5003. I did not find a reference to Errata ID 5003 for the changes to section 10.1. But, you are right that the other erratas are mentioned. I should have double checked that. Regards, Christer
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
