> On 7. Jun 2018, at 02:40, Christer Holmberg <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> Hi Michael,
> 
> Please see inline.
> 
>>> On 4. Jun 2018, at 05:17, Christer Holmberg
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Re-sent due to wrong e-mail address.
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> I have also looked at this document, and there are things that I have
>>>> think are unclear:
>>>> 
>>>> Q1: It is Informational, and it does not update RFC 4960. Instead, it
>>>> just
>>>> seems to list the erratas (but without even referencing them, as noted
>>>> by
>>>> Paul). I think that it should be made very clear that this document is
>>>> only for guidance, and that implementers shall use the actual erratas
>>>> for
>>>> the actual updates.
>> Please note that the documents covers the following processed erratas and
>> also mentions this:
>> 
>> * 
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-errata-06#section-3.1
>> covers Errata ID 1440.
>> * 
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-errata-06#section-3.2
>> covers Errata ID 1574.
>> * 
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-errata-06#section-3.3
>> covers Errata ID 2592.
>> * 
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-errata-06#section-3.4
>> covers Errata ID 3291 and Errata ID 3804.
>> * 
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-errata-06#section-3.5
>> covers Errata ID 3423.
>> * 
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-errata-06#section-3.6
>> covers Errata ID 3788.
>> * 
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-errata-06#section-3.7
>> covers Errata ID 4071.
>> * 
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-errata-06#section-3.8
>> covers Errata ID 4400.
>> * 
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-errata-06#section-3.9
>> covers Errata ID 5003.
> 
> I did not find a reference to Errata ID 5003 for the changes to section
> 10.1. But, you are right that the other erratas are mentioned. I should
> have double checked that.
Hi Christer,

sorry for not be precise. By double checking that the erratas where covered
I figured out that 5003 was not mentioned (one of the typos) and I added
it yesterday:
https://github.com/sctplab/rfc4960bis/commit/b8e4e8c6c558c66dab4530cce1b0b5af8eea9b0f

Sorry for the confusion.

Best regards
Michael
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Christer

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to