On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 21:33, Sarah Stierch <[email protected]> wrote: > I also think (after working in the fashion and photography private sector > for almost 10 years before non-profits) that model releases are as important > as OTRS copyright releases when it comes to "sexual" content on Wikipedia. > Whether nude photos, cock shots, or booty shorts. I'm sure most of the > people who have nude photos or sexual photos of themselves on Commons have > no clue.
And if they do know, do we have a reasonable system in place for them to complain? As things stand, it seems they're expected to write to an anonymous OTRS volunteer. Are they expected to give their real name, and how do they prove the image is of them? It would be good to hear from someone how this works in practice. Sarah _______________________________________________ Gendergap mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
