On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 03:14, Fred Bauder <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 22:22, John Vandenberg <[email protected]> wrote: >>> As Sarah Stierch points out, our images of sexuality and reproduction >>> are crap, broadly speaking, and our paperwork/processes are >>> self-evidently not good for attracting high quality photographs. What >>> processes should we put in place to encourage good quality photographs >>> of this kind. e.g. should we set up a separate OTRS queue to process >>> the paperwork for these photographs? Should it be managed by >>> verified non-anonymous women only? >>> >> This last point is an excellent suggestion. Lots of people would be >> rightly reluctant to email a completely anonymous email address, read >> by lots of people, about such a sensitive issue. If there were a >> dedicated address, where the complaint would be read and handled only >> by other women, that could make a huge difference. >> >> Sarah > > What shows up in a OTRS request is your username and your email address. > However, the nature of most objectionable material usually reveals > identity. My thought is that there should be a women's OTRS address which > handles any request, including matters which do not relate to images, > which women want to address only to women. If that makes it easier to > approach us regarding delicate issues it should be available. I suppose > there would have to also be women only review. > > However, I'm not real sure how material is assigned to queues within > OTRS, so the possibility exists of a request being viewed by a man on its > way to the women's queue. > Hi Fred, if it were an entirely separate address it would work, an email address that is only ever read by women volunteers.
Sarah _______________________________________________ Gendergap mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
