> >> >> Right now, I think that we should assume that most people value their >> privacy, and unless they have actively given consent for a nude image >> we >> should delete it to protect their right to privacy, and the right to >> control >> the way that their photograph is used. >> >> Sydney >> >> User:FloNight > > Yes, the rule should be that personally identifying images should be > routinely suppressed in the absence of permission from an identifiable > person who has signed an informed release. An informed release would > include a declaration that they understand how open source image > licensing works. > > There are privacy issues. Can a person remain anonymous and release an > image of themselves. If so, how, in the case of Commons or Wikipedia? > > We routinely use the oversight tool on the English Wikipedia to suppress > phone numbers and home addresses as releases of personal information. > > Fred
If a person is identifiable to their social set, family, or even to just themselves, permission should be required if there is sexual or sexually suggestive content. Fred _______________________________________________ Gendergap mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
