Yeah me for sending a personnal mail to the whole list :)

Caroline


2012/2/1 Caroline Becker <[email protected]>

> Hi, this is a personnal mail (not on the gender-gap list).
>
> "two of the most famous pop stars in the world, at least in the US.)" is
> a really, really funny sentence :) Either they are famous "in the world",
> ie not only in the US, or "in the US" so not "in the world" :)
>
> Again, this is funny, not a horrible mistake of yours :)
>
> Caroline
>
>
> 2012/2/1 Sarah Stierch <[email protected]>
>
>>  Laura - Thanks for asking for more contributions. I was wondering what
>> was going on, since the project has seemed a bit quiet lately! Glad to know
>> it's catching steam again. I made some edits a few months ago to the US
>> section.  (See comments below)
>>
>>
>> On 2/1/12 5:18 AM, Lodewijk wrote:
>>
>> Perhaps it would be helpful if you could add some explanation why you are
>> collecting this information, what you want to make clear. Because as I
>> explained before to you privately (and I see nothing has changed) at least
>> for the Netherlands the stats that have been put up are almost hilarious.
>> Lots of percentages, but every Dutch person will be able to tell you that
>> many of them are of no meaning (Ripuarian is not a language spoken at any
>> significant level in the Netherlands, Zealandic is considered mainly a
>> dialect and has 1 admin, of course there are no Dutch women in the enwiki
>> arbcom, because to my best knowledge there are no Dutch people in there at
>> all at this moment, and I would wonder why there are no Dutch female admins
>> on the Portuguese Wikinews...) I am not sure if it is just me, but reading
>> this page (
>> http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/WikiWomenCamp/FAQ/Perspectives/Netherlands )
>> I would almost think that this is a parody of something - I can't tell if
>> it is the same in other countries.
>>
>>
>> I've also been highly confused by these statistics. It confused me so
>> much that I acted boldy and removed them from the United States section.
>> http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/WikiWomenCamp/FAQ/Perspectives#United_States
>> When I started to see information on how there were no Portuguese women
>> involved in Algerian Wikipedia I was like "why would there be? and is this
>> information here?"
>>
>> I rewrote the majority of the section to just discuss women's roles in
>> the United States - at WMF, as fellows, as researchers, as Wikimedians and
>> active editors, etc. I created a list of people who are active US
>> Wikimedians who are known to be women (didn't want to make assumptions
>> about anyone) and some of the cool things they've been doing. Of course,
>> these are limited to people I know, so I hope others are added (as someone
>> did me). I also removed the "US related on Wikipedia" in regards to the
>> subject matter (which was added back). I wasn't really sure why netball
>> would be featured because it's not popular in America at all, so to me it
>> doesn't really tell us anything, but it's not popular. Same with roller
>> derby. (But other women's sports aren't discussed?) So I guess if someone
>> has interest in discussing American women's sports, this area has room for
>> expansion, or IMHO removal. And the list of popular biographies makes sense
>> - Amy Winehouse died when this data was retrieved and I'm sure her
>> popularity has been replaced. And it's no surprise that "someone from
>> Barbados" is in the top 10 - it's Rhianna, and same for Nicki Minaj (two of
>> the most famous pop stars in the world, at least in the US.)  I just don't'
>> think this shows much about women who contribute to Wikipedia except that
>> people of all genders like reading articles about pop stars and media
>> frenzies.
>>
>> I'm more curious about how women are active and what women are doing. Who
>> are planning events, have those been successes? Are people being hired by
>> Wiki companies? (Not just Wikimedia.) What is participation like regarding
>> women and other Wiki websites? (This conference is about that right, not
>> just Wikimedia?). Sadly I can't gather data on those, nor do I know how,
>> but it would be cool to know what the most popular Wiki's are for women and
>> so forth.
>>
>>
>>  I am sure your intentions are good though, so perhaps it would be
>> helpful to state somewhere what kind of information you're looking for that
>> is *really* informative, and get rid of the non-relevant parts? I would say
>> that the semi-automated adding of information isn't exactly helpful in at
>> least the Dutch case - again, I can't vouch for other countries. Some
>> information *is* interesting (interest ratios on Facebook or other external
>> websites) and it would be a waste if that gets discarded because of the
>> irrelevance of the rest of the page.
>>
>>
>> +1. I think this has really cool potential to focus on "original
>> research" - just knowing who is doing what and sharing that information. I
>> took the time on the US section to not only celebrate who is doing what,
>> but, opportunities that women have been given in the movement in the US. I
>> wanted people to see what women were doing in the United States, not what
>> they *aren't* doing. We already know the statistics are depressing about
>> women's participating - so what are women doing to change that or to be a
>> part of that?
>>
>> Thanks Lodewijk and Srikanth for sharing your thoughts! I was beginning
>> to think I was the only person who had these thoughts!
>>
>> And thanks Laura for spearheading a unique and interesting opportunity to
>> learn more about women around the world in the community. I hope people be
>> bold and participate!
>>
>> Sarah
>>
>> --
>> *Sarah Stierch*
>> *Wikimedia Foundation Community Fellow*
>> >>Support the sharing of free knowledge around the world: donate 
>> >>today<https://donate.wikimedia.org/>
>> <<
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gendergap mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap

Reply via email to