On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 6:36 AM, Neotarf <[email protected]> wrote: > Any journalists in future wanting examples of it need only read those > archives and the dispute-resolution threads that failed to deal with it > (which one of us ought to compile at some point). > > An interesting idea. What would such a compilation look like? (Spoken as > someone who used to write the Arbitration Report for the *Signpost*). > > Neotarf >
Hi Neotarf, I think the GGTF page from June to December may become important for journalists and even historians because it makes clear how entrenched and overt the sexism is. The dispute-resolution threads on AN, AN/I and various talk pages show women either failing to get help for a situation that should have been a no-brainer, or getting it only after protracted discussion. The difficulty is that the threads are scattered, and there are threads that are directly and indirectly related to GGTF. It would be a good idea to compile a list of these threads that we can post on the GGTF archives (perhaps as a template), so that everything is easy to find.
_______________________________________________ Gendergap mailing list [email protected] To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
