Can anyone point to where this "troll" behavior happened? There don't seem to be a lot of specifics in this article, and I'm wondering if it's gender trolls (which are, alas, plentiful) or a culture clash between old editors and new ones over unfamiliar policies?
On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Carol Moore dc <[email protected]> wrote: > On 4/10/2015 6:33 PM, Siko Bouterse wrote: > >> This is the grant proposal referenced at the end of that article >> (currently under review as part of Inspire): >> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IdeaLab/More_ >> Female_Architects_on_Wikipedia >> >> I remember NOT commenting on that one because I figured, who could have > a problem with that? > > How soon we forget that getting MORE women articles and editors was and > remains controversial. > > Banging head vs. wall.... > > > CM > > > _______________________________________________ > Gendergap mailing list > [email protected] > To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please > visit: > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap >
_______________________________________________ Gendergap mailing list [email protected] To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
