Interesting, thanks for the links! We also now have mix-n-match and Charles
Matthews has matched the complete Oxford Dictionary of National Biography,
With autolist I could probably look at those male-female ratios per
occupation. Might be interesting. I don't know how to get at the "deleted &
recreated" data though

On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 8:01 PM, Joseph Reagle <[email protected]>
wrote:

> On 04/13/2015 01:18 PM, Jane Darnell wrote:
> > Actually I think it would be useful to measure all existing female bios
> > vs all existing male bios for the proportion of those which have been
> > previously deleted and recreated. I have a theory that it is much more
> > difficult to create bios of females in whatever category due to the
> > systemic academic bias aginst including women's biographies in the list
> > of "reliable sources" mostly used in Wikipedia. I would be especially
> > interested in comparison of male-female ration of bios in established
> > dictionaries of biography and how these compare to Wikipedia, and of
> > those, how many such bios were previously deleted on Wikipedia and
> > recreated.
>
> Hi Jane, I've done comparative work on coverage bias in biographies
> between WP and Britannica [1]. I've also shared my data [2] with an
> author of [3] who is extending that  analysis to include structural,
> lexical, and visibility bias. I think addressing deletion and recreation
> wouldn't be too hard...
>
> [1]: http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/777/631
> [2]: http://reagle.org/joseph/2010/06/gender/results
> [3]: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1501.06307v1.pdf
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gendergap mailing list
> [email protected]
> To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please
> visit:
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
[email protected]
To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap

Reply via email to