Yes, ask Leigh. I heard previously that Spanish Wikipedia has some eager deletionists, as English.Wikipedia does also.
Pine On Apr 17, 2015 6:20 AM, "J Hayes" <[email protected]> wrote: > maybe a note to leigh themadattar User:Thelmadatter? > > who was mentioned in a blog > https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/04/13/wiki-learning-edit-a-thon-mexico/ > > good reason to go to wikimania > > > On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Neotarf <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Does anyone know what's going on with the Spanish Wikipedia? The last >> two articles I created, of Laxmi_Aggarwal and Maha Al Muneef--women who >> have been awarded the International Women of Courage Award--have been >> nominated for speedy deletion as not being encyclopedic. See my talk page >> <http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usuario_discusi%C3%B3n:Neotarf>. My >> article on the award itself <http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mujer_coraje> >> remains untouched, but you can see the only articles that remain as blue >> links are of Hispanic women. >> >> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 4:22 AM, Jane Darnell <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Interesting, thanks for the links! We also now have mix-n-match and >>> Charles Matthews has matched the complete Oxford Dictionary of National >>> Biography, With autolist I could probably look at those male-female ratios >>> per occupation. Might be interesting. I don't know how to get at the >>> "deleted & recreated" data though >>> >>> On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 8:01 PM, Joseph Reagle <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 04/13/2015 01:18 PM, Jane Darnell wrote: >>>> > Actually I think it would be useful to measure all existing female >>>> bios >>>> > vs all existing male bios for the proportion of those which have been >>>> > previously deleted and recreated. I have a theory that it is much more >>>> > difficult to create bios of females in whatever category due to the >>>> > systemic academic bias aginst including women's biographies in the >>>> list >>>> > of "reliable sources" mostly used in Wikipedia. I would be especially >>>> > interested in comparison of male-female ration of bios in established >>>> > dictionaries of biography and how these compare to Wikipedia, and of >>>> > those, how many such bios were previously deleted on Wikipedia and >>>> > recreated. >>>> >>>> Hi Jane, I've done comparative work on coverage bias in biographies >>>> between WP and Britannica [1]. I've also shared my data [2] with an >>>> author of [3] who is extending that analysis to include structural, >>>> lexical, and visibility bias. I think addressing deletion and recreation >>>> wouldn't be too hard... >>>> >>>> [1]: http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/777/631 >>>> [2]: http://reagle.org/joseph/2010/06/gender/results >>>> [3]: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1501.06307v1.pdf >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Gendergap mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, >>>> please visit: >>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Gendergap mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please >>> visit: >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Gendergap mailing list >> [email protected] >> To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please >> visit: >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Gendergap mailing list > [email protected] > To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please > visit: > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap >
_______________________________________________ Gendergap mailing list [email protected] To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
