On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Risker <[email protected]> wrote:

> Give me a break, Neotarf. I am critiquing the article and the decisions by
> its author and its publisher.  It doesn't surprise me that having someone
> of Keilana's stature drop more f-bombs in a couple of paragraphs than I
> heard on a bus full of high school students this morning will change the
> climate to suggest that it is now perfectly acceptable to curse out people
> everywhere under every circumstance.
>
> For some strange reason, it appears the people on this list are
> celebrating that fact.  And it has nothing to do with gender, really, and
> everything to do with making Wikipedia a pleasant place to work.  Keilana's
> actions have encouraged people to make it less so.
>
> Risker/Anne
>


Keilana didn't curse anyone out. That should be kept clear. But it has been
commonplace and acceptable to curse in Wikipedia discussions for ages. You
have witnessed the failure of attempts to curtail cursing etc. first hand,
and "civility police" has at times been one of the worst insults slung
around on the English Wikipedia.  What is strange for some is that
Keilana's op-ed is an example of one of the most benign uses of strong
language, and yet it has garnered a stronger negative reaction than many
much more serious and damaging profane personal attacks.

Additionally, not only have I never heard "badass" used in a derogatory
way, I've never even once heard anyone suggest that it might be used as an
insult. In my experience it has only ever been a compliment. In the context
of Keilana's op-ed, it should be obvious to any reader that she used it
positively.
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
[email protected]
To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap

Reply via email to