I'm unfamiliar with this situation, but if there's a functionary whose off-wiki behavior calls into question of the appropriateness of his/her continuing to have access to PII, please do forward that information to SuSa, the Ombudsman Committee, and/or (as applicable) the local arbitration committee that would have the ability to investigate the situation.
Pine On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 8:29 PM, J Hayes <slowki...@gmail.com> wrote: > yes, that functionary and his behavior on meta has chilled the > participation of some librarian editors > they are highly skeptical of wiki harrassment efforts as long as he is in > a position to see personal identifying information. > they do not trust check user to be done responsibly as well > > this is impacting our efforts to engage a GLAM institution. > > > On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 1:23 PM, Neotarf <neot...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Speaking of dox and in-person events, a few months ago one of the >> WP:BADSITES known for dox had a thread about attending a WMF >> harassment workshop. So anyone who is not comfortable with a paper >> trail, and would prefer face-to-face conversations with allies, could >> actually find themselves face to face with their harassers instead. >> >
_______________________________________________ Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
