What are the alternatives to the architecture you described as being a 
problem? How would you do it?

At 01:08 AM 9/29/2002 -0500, you wrote:

>That is something that always bothered me about the current PKI that we
>use for ecommerce and SSL.  I, for one, never agreed to trust Verisign,
>Thawte, or any of the dozens of other CA's in my browser that i've never
>heard of.  Yet the absolute number 1 rule in PKI, is you HAVE to TRUST the
>CA.  If you don't trust the CA, then everything else goes out the window.
>Who decides the "trusted" CA's that get distributed with IE, Netscape,
>Mozilla, etc...  perhaps this is documented in the SSL specs somewhere?
>I assumed the app vendor makes the choice... and i'm not too keen on
>letting Microsoft decide who we can/can't trust, especially when it
>involves money.
>
>An open source/public CA sounds like a good idea, but it does take a lot
>of time and money to verify who people say they are.  You can't just go
>around signing certificates for every tom, dick, and harry, when come to
>find out, their names are really moe, larry, and curly.  I think the CA
>needs to be backed by the government.  By the NSF, or maybe even the SEC
>if it concerns ecommerce.
>
>The other thing that pisses me off is Verisign makes billions and billions
>of dollars by just sending you a little text file.  That'll be $250/year,
>per server.  I wish i would have had that idea, haha....
>
>ray
>--
>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>Ray DeJean                                      http://www.r-a-y.org
>Systems Engineer                    Southeastern Louisiana University
>IBM Certified Specialist              AIX Administration, AIX Support
>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>
>
>
>On Sun, 29 Sep 2002, Tim Fournet wrote:
>
> > My guess is there is some process involved in getting added to the list
> > of "well-known" CAs that applications such as mail user agents and web
> > browsers know to look up against. That being done, it would require a
> > grass-roots type of  web of trust to validate public keys, such as what
> > Thawte's personal key program does/did (only truly free). This is
> > certainly something that's possible within the Open Source community. I
> > wonder if there is anyone else about, especially in the Liberty Project,
> > who's thinking of doing this.
> >
> > -Tim
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>General mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://host19.nocdirect.com/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net


---
Dustin Puryear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Puryear Information Technology
Windows, UNIX, and IT Consulting
http://www.puryear-it.com



Reply via email to