--=-QwepNOQHXLZhfqPV6sO4 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wed, 2003-04-16 at 07:23, John Hebert wrote: > No trying to start a religious flame war or anything, but why not OpenBSD= ?=20 > I've thought about doing the same thing in the past; make a very secure=20 > Linux box, but it seems that it would be less work to do the same with=20 > OpenBSD, especially with the relative amounts of patches released for eac= h=20 > OS. The main reason I am using gentoo is that, to me, its easier to keep up to date. It seems a lot harder to upgrade between *BSD releases than in Gentoo. I actually tried OpenBSD on a computer, and it worked and such (everything up to the point of NAT: I couldn't seem to get the configuration right on that one). I just want to try different things :) OpenBSD has only had one hole in the basic install for 7 years :)=20 --=20 Mat Branyon http://www.louisiana.edu/~mwb7791 --=-QwepNOQHXLZhfqPV6sO4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA+nVYIadbUG229XJoRAi4NAJ9SJIvbIg4SbRNCfXnxmLH/Pp+usgCghM4O lq/g06BD2Xc7vxC0Mj0YhQw= =Nxzo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-QwepNOQHXLZhfqPV6sO4--
