On Wed, 16 Apr 2003 08:09:29 -0500, Mat Branyon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-04-16 at 07:23, John Hebert wrote: >> No trying to start a religious flame war or anything, but why not > OpenBSD? >> I've thought about doing the same thing in the past; make a very > secure >> Linux box, but it seems that it would be less work to do the same with > >> OpenBSD, especially with the relative amounts of patches released for > each >> OS. > > The main reason I am using gentoo is that, to me, its easier to keep up > to date. It seems a lot harder to upgrade between *BSD releases than > in Gentoo. Good point. > I actually tried OpenBSD on a computer, and it worked and such > (everything up to the point of NAT: I couldn't seem to get the > configuration right on that one). I just want to try different things > :) Can't fault you there. > OpenBSD has only had one hole in the basic install for 7 years :) It ain't flashy, but it does the job. ;) -- John Hebert System Engineer I T Group, Inc. http://www.it-group.com
