--- -ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Mar 2004, John Hebert wrote:
> I also think M$
> will
> > ultimately end up as a home entertainment
> appliance
> > and media company.
> 
> Interesting, I'd never thought of Microsoft that
> way.  Thanks for your
> insight.  Scary though... i'd never had an
> "appliance" or game console
> crash on me -- i'm talking VCR's, stereo's,
> Nintendo, Atari, Playstation,
> etc -- that is, until i bought an Xbox.
> 
> My cell phone did crash one time though :)

Well, it is interesting to think about. Ultimately,
what is Microsoft's real value? IMO, it is their GUI.
Now, before you laugh (especially in comparison to the
superior Mac UI), the M$ _Windows_ interface hasn't
changed in almost 10 years now. Bill Gates's genius
was in recognizing that the operating system was the
most valuable (read: "profitable") part of a computer.
But what equivalent breakthrough products have they
made since then? I happen to be booted into WinXP
while I am writing this message via a web browser; I
could just as easily be doing this in Win95. Or Linux,
for example.

The operating system was not considered that valuable
when Microsoft first started; it was assumed the money
was to be made in selling the hardware. Sure, the Mac
was way ahead of the IBM PC in both hardware and
software, but the IBM PC was cheaper, and even though
it had a crappy OS, people bought em, mostly to run
(and only run) Lotus123. IBM was too greedy thinking
about the profit on their hardware and pretty much
gave away their advantage in making a deal with Bill G
to provide a rudimentary OS for it.

Steven Jobs was blinded by his desire to create the
near-perfect computing experience, thereby making his
products too expensive for most people. What Jobs
_should_ have done is swallowed his competitive pride
and developed on OS for the IBM PC. We would be in a
different world now; for better or worse, who knows?

Most Windows users are not technical computer
professionals. They are simply "users", who treat an
MS Windows box as an appliance. One reason that Linux
is attractive to IT professionals is because it is
flexible and can be used to create complete custom
solutions to computing problems. I read a quote by Doc
Searls a few years back that "Linux is a 2x4. It is
raw building material." In comparison, M$ is like
staying at a Holiday Inn with crappy TVs in all the
rooms. The longer you stay there, the more miserable
you become. And you have to stay there, because the
only other choices are an expensive resort for rich
artists and a DIY trailer park. The DIY trailer park
improves every year though.

The Internet was the turning of the tide. Finally,
there was something that was bigger and more
influential than Microsoft, Apple, IBM and rest.
Microsoft finally _had_ to give in and support that
weird "Internet" thing, otherwise Netscape was going
to steal their thunder. As someone else pointed out,
M$ is a wannabe ISP. Microsoft was blind-sided by
Netscape because it had its eye on AOL at that time.

IMO, Microsoft will ultimately lose the battle for the
server, simply because using it restricts an IT
professional's freedom to create solutions. It will
hold on to the majority of the desktop market, but
over time the desktop market will actually become a
very small computer market, relative to the numbers of
computing devices that will be around in the future.
Microsoft has already lost control of proprietary
protocols; the Internet and its suite of associated
open protocols and standards put the nail in that
coffin. Microsoft's influence on protocols and
standards will become smaller over time, ending with
the M$ Office formats. Microsoft is not growing like
it once was; when the market is saturated (operating
systems), you must either start selling something new
(Xbox, home network hardware) or get your customers to
upgrade (who in the heck is going to buy Longhorn when
Win9x can reach homestarrunner.com just fine?). The
market won't be clamoring for Longhorn, IMO.

So, what's left? How will M$ return recurring value to
their shareholders? Simple. M$ will purchase some
media companies; Disney would be a good investment,
maybe a cable company or two. Doesn't M$ own a large
share of NBC already? The next few years will tell the
tale of Microsoft's future. It will be interesting to watch.

=====
John Hebert
Official BRLUG Linux Curmudgeon
Open Source Ankle Biter

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search - Find what you’re looking for faster
http://search.yahoo.com

Reply via email to