Ah, here is a good article on the Microsoft/BSD code deal:

http://www.kuro5hin.org/?op=displaystory;sid=2001/6/19/05641/7357

Well worth the read and very interesting.

--
Dustin Puryear
President and Sr. Consultant
Puryear Information Technology, LLC
225-706-8414 x112
http://www.puryear-it.com

Author, "Best Practices for Managing Linux and UNIX Servers"
   http://www.puryear-it.com/pubs/linux-unix-best-practices/


Andrew Baudouin wrote:
> They have some BSD code within their network stack, but having such is 
> not an issue (BSD code is truly free).  I've never heard anyone accuse 
> MS of having kernel code that belongs to Linux.  The Gnu toolchain is 
> another story entirely.
> 
> Novell has plenty of their IP or at least could be accused of having it 
> through Mono.
> 
> On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Dustin Puryear <[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
> 
>     Hmm, I remember that Microsoft had made a comment that they thought that
>     Linux had some IP of theirs, but they never pursued it. Nor did they
>     publish details, so I think that was either FUD or they knew that going
>     down the SCO route was a bad, bad, bad idea. Microsoft tends to have
>     some smart people at the top, and I don't think they really ever
>     considered a direct fight like that with Linux or OSS.
> 
>     What code does Microsoft have that belongs to Linux? I've heard that
>     one. I'd like to know more.
> 
>     --
>     Dustin Puryear
>     President and Sr. Consultant
>     Puryear Information Technology, LLC
>     225-706-8414 x112
>     http://www.puryear-it.com
> 
>     Author, "Best Practices for Managing Linux and UNIX Servers"
>       http://www.puryear-it.com/pubs/linux-unix-best-practices/
> 
> 
>     Brad Bendily wrote:
>      > The link in your blog has the best explanation of the Novell/MS
>      > agreement I have seen:
>      > http://www.novell.com/linux/microsoft/faq.html
>      >
>      > Do you know if MS has a similar link on their page? I wonder what the
>      > view is from their side?
>      >
>      >>From what I can tell, all this means is that MS won't sue any SuSE
>      > Linux or its customers for patent issues and
>      > Novell won't sue MS or MS customers for patent issues.
>      >
>      > Didn't this come out around the time of the "SCO owns linux" debate,
>      > when a lot of details about the
>      > origination of "code" was coming out and being found. Didn't it come
>      > out that MS stole some Linux code? And maybe Linux
>      > stole some MS code or ideas?
>      >
>      > I think this was just a way for both companies to protect their
>      > interest and their customers. And to try to provide peace of mind
>      > to both their customers. Nothing more.
>      > bb
>      >
>      > On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Dustin Puryear
>     <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>      >> You do realize that IBM applies for and is granted more patents than
>      >> almost any other company in the world? Whether we like current
>     patent
>      >> law or not, the law is the law. So I don't think that it makes
>     sense to
>      >> put these companies into a pro- or anti-free side of the ring
>     based on a
>      >> company's endorsement of patents, since they all use them, and some,
>      >> like IBM, use them quite a lot.
>      >>
>      >> This isn't to say that IBM isn't promoting a free culture (as I
>     noted in
>      >> the blog), but we need to also know that IBM isn't exactly open
>     in all
>      >> of its business and it, along with most for-profit companies, has an
>      >> agenda. That agenda is not about being nice. It's about making
>     money.
>      >>
>      >> --
>      >> Dustin Puryear
>      >> President and Sr. Consultant
>      >> Puryear Information Technology, LLC
>      >> 225-706-8414 x112
>      >> http://www.puryear-it.com
>      >>
>      >> Author, "Best Practices for Managing Linux and UNIX Servers"
>      >>   http://www.puryear-it.com/pubs/linux-unix-best-practices/
>      >>
>      >>
>      >> willhill wrote:
>      >>> I saw this article today:
>      >>>
>      >>>
>     
> http://www.oreillynet.com/onlamp/blog/2008/08/novell_aint_the_bad_guy.html?CMP=OTC-6YE827253101&ATT=Novell+Aint+the+Bad+Guy
>     
> <http://www.oreillynet.com/onlamp/blog/2008/08/novell_aint_the_bad_guy.html?CMP=OTC-6YE827253101&ATT=Novell+Aint+the+Bad+Guy>
>      >>>
>      >>> and have to say that I don't like what Novel is doing.
>      Software patents are
>      >>> evil and Novel's endorsement of them is also evil.  Any
>     advantage Novel has
>      >>> gained by through their deal is odious.  GPL3 negates those
>     advantages and it
>      >>> will eventually take over all GPL'd work.
>      >>>
>      >>> IBM has not really endorsed the deal either.  They have also
>     partnered with
>      >>> Red Hat and Cononical which have both loudly refused M$'s money
>     and patent
>      >>> trap.
>      >>>
>      >>> What's more important about IBM's announcement is willingness
>     to push for a
>      >>> free world and the good chance they will get there.  Just a few
>     years ago,
>      >>> that kind of talk would get you branded a "radical" or "zealot"
>     ... even in
>      >>> places like a LUG.  IBM is doing a lot of good things for
>     software freedom.
>      >>>
>      >>> _______________________________________________
>      >>> General mailing list
>      >>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>      >>> http://mail.brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net
>      >>>
>      >>> --
>      >>> This message was scanned by ESVA and is believed to be clean.
>      >>> Click here to report this message as spam.
>      >>> http://esva.puryear-it.com/cgi-bin/learn-msg.cgi?id=
>      >>>
>      >>>
>      >> _______________________________________________
>      >> General mailing list
>      >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>      >> http://mail.brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net
>      >>
>      >
>      >
>      >
> 
>     _______________________________________________
>     General mailing list
>     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     http://mail.brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> This message was scanned by ESVA and is believed to be clean.
> Click here to report this message as spam. < 
> http://esva.puryear-it.com/cgi-bin/learn-msg.cgi?id= >
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> General mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net

_______________________________________________
General mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net

Reply via email to