Is anyone currently in contact with IBM over this project? Who has taken the lead on it so far?
-----Original Message----- From: Uday Parmar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 2:10 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Evaluating the 'Open Sourcing' of Daffodil DB James, Thats the latest I could find. It doesn't really add to what we already know. Am sending it anyway ;0) Links: http://www.asiacomputerweekly.com/acw_ViewArt.cfm?Magid=1&Artid=24738&Catid= 8&subcat=75 http://news.com.com/IBM+to+make+Java+database+open+source/2100-7344_3-529102 5.html?tag=nefd.top http://searchdomino.techtarget.com/originalContent/0,289142,sid4_gci1000676, 00.html Link from theserverside.com: http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=27721 Cheers, Uday ----- Original Message ----- From: "James Maes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004 3:40 AM Subject: RE: Evaluating the 'Open Sourcing' of Daffodil DB >I haven't heard any more news about cloudscape. Does anyone have any > details on it? > > -----Original Message----- > From: Rodney Waldhoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, August 30, 2004 5:03 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Evaluating the 'Open Sourcing' of Daffodil DB > > On Sat, 28 Aug 2004, Uday Parmar wrote: > >> However, the issue that come into my mind is that ASF already has a >> similar project running under the Derby banner. We understand that ASF >> is not averse to adopting projects in which there is some functionality >> overlap with an existing project. However, I still wanted to understand >> members thoughts on how Derby would affect our chances of being selected >> by ASF. > > I don't believe that the presence of Derby (or Axion) should adversely > affect the evaluation of Daffodil. We (the ASF *and* Daffodil) should > consider how Daffodil/Derby/Axion might inter-relate, but a Daffodil > proposal should primarily be considered on its own merits.
