James,
Thats the latest I could find. It doesn't really add to what we already know. Am sending it anyway ;0)
Links:
http://www.asiacomputerweekly.com/acw_ViewArt.cfm?Magid=1&Artid=24738&Catid=8&subcat=75
http://news.com.com/IBM+to+make+Java+database+open+source/2100-7344_3-5291025.html?tag=nefd.top
http://searchdomino.techtarget.com/originalContent/0,289142,sid4_gci1000676,00.html
Link from theserverside.com:
http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=27721
Cheers, Uday
----- Original Message ----- From: "James Maes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004 3:40 AM
Subject: RE: Evaluating the 'Open Sourcing' of Daffodil DB
I haven't heard any more news about cloudscape. Does anyone have any details on it?
-----Original Message----- From: Rodney Waldhoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 30, 2004 5:03 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Evaluating the 'Open Sourcing' of Daffodil DB
On Sat, 28 Aug 2004, Uday Parmar wrote:
However, the issue that come into my mind is that ASF already has a similar project running under the Derby banner. We understand that ASF is not averse to adopting projects in which there is some functionality overlap with an existing project. However, I still wanted to understand members thoughts on how Derby would affect our chances of being selected by ASF.
I don't believe that the presence of Derby (or Axion) should adversely
affect the evaluation of Daffodil. We (the ASF *and* Daffodil) should
consider how Daffodil/Derby/Axion might inter-relate, but a Daffodil
proposal should primarily be considered on its own merits.
