The dictionary <http://www.jsoftware.com/help/dictionary/d630n.htm> defines the dyad x m&v y ↔ m&v^:x y . Therefore,
4 (3&^) 2 ↔ (3&^)^:4 ]2 ↔ (3&^)(3&^)(3&^)(3&^) 2 ↔ ^/ 3 3 3 3 2 ↔ _ 4 (3&*) 2 ↔ (3&*)^:4 ]2 ↔ (3&*)(3&*)(3&*)(3&*) 2 ↔ */ 3 3 3 3 2 ↔ 162 Happy New Year! On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 12:41 AM, Dr. Heinz Schild < [email protected]> wrote: > How is the adverb "Bond" functioning in dyadic tacit phrases like > 4 (3&^) 2 -> _ > 4 (3&*) 2 -> 162 > ? > I can not interpret these results. > How do these phrases look as explicit definitions? > > Regards > Heinz Schild > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
