Thank you very much for your prompt response. Unfortunately the paperback dictionary for J which I have bought in 2003 does not show a definition for the dyadic Bond (page 205).
Also a Happy New Year to you. Heinz Schild Am 01.01.2013 um 10:17 schrieb Roger Hui <[email protected]>: > The dictionary <http://www.jsoftware.com/help/dictionary/d630n.htm> defines > the dyad x m&v y ↔ m&v^:x y . Therefore, > > 4 (3&^) 2 ↔ (3&^)^:4 ]2 ↔ (3&^)(3&^)(3&^)(3&^) 2 ↔ ^/ 3 3 3 3 2 ↔ _ > > 4 (3&*) 2 ↔ (3&*)^:4 ]2 ↔ (3&*)(3&*)(3&*)(3&*) 2 ↔ */ 3 3 3 3 2 ↔ 162 > > Happy New Year! > > > > > On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 12:41 AM, Dr. Heinz Schild < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> How is the adverb "Bond" functioning in dyadic tacit phrases like >> 4 (3&^) 2 -> _ >> 4 (3&*) 2 -> 162 >> ? >> I can not interpret these results. >> How do these phrases look as explicit definitions? >> >> Regards >> Heinz Schild >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
