I don't see any problem in an addon being documented in github. It is nice to have all addons referenced somewhere in the wiki, but the reference can just be a redirect to a github page.
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 3:54 PM, Ian Clark <[email protected]> wrote: > > So I would not be too quick to toss out the old. > > I've invested a lot of my time in jwiki in the past, so I ought to be the > last to do that. > > Maybe I was being provocative – or just alarmed? > > In topics where I'm a beginner, I do appreciate one-stop shops. Multiple > competing sources for goods and services do make me wonder if that's not a > sign that none of them are up to the job. So… from my experience of Github > I wonder if it would inevitably displace jwiki – at least for those addons > that matter. Should we be glad – or dismayed? > > If the "addon corpus" on jwiki (=JAL?) were in a good state and therefore > unassailable, I for one would not be "glad". > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
