There is an example of Newton-Raphson here:
https://code.jsoftware.com/wiki/NYCJUG/2010-11-09#Newton.27s_method .

On Sat, Dec 25, 2021 at 2:17 PM Henry Rich <[email protected]> wrote:

> What I meant was, if you are tempted to add verbs for various domains,
> datatypes, definitions of integration, etc, you don't have a complete
> spec.  That's where I think we are with d./D. .  You will end up with
> two entry points defined as primitives, and who knows how many as named
> verbs.  The correct number of primitives for an application like that is 0.
>
> Henry Rich
>
> On 12/25/2021 2:08 PM, Raul Miller wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 25, 2021 at 11:11 AM Henry Rich <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >> It is possible to have d. and D. call an addon, but I don't see that
> >> that makes it much better.  And, primitives should only be functions
> >> that have a cast-iron spec.
> > I believe that d. and D. do have a cast iron spec. The problem we face
> > with them is the implementation of that spec is daunting.
> >
> > Past practice here has been to throw nonce errors for parts of the
> > infinite domain which are currently not treatable and to construct
> > verbs who return the primary value when that's an issue and a domain
> > error for values where the original function was known to be not
> > differentiable.
> >
> > That said, J's documentation should document the limitations of
> > floating point numbers at least briefly, and should similarly document
> > the limitations of analytic mechanisms like d. and D. at least
> > briefly.
> >
> > (And, in this context, it's worth noting that the "cast iron spec" for
> > floating point numbers has resulted in the industry supporting quite a
> > variety of floating point numbers -- J supports a subset of those
> > formats, with one which fits the host machine's architecture as the
> > primary format. This is relevant here because the limitations on
> > floating point numbers are intimately tied to limitations of
> > approaches for the d. family of operations.)
> >
> > (Also, I think that the d. documentation should have an implementation
> > of the Newton Raphson algorithm as an example.)
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
>
>
> --
> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
> https://www.avg.com
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>


-- 

Devon McCormick, CFA

Quantitative Consultant
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to