And if so, running J in this way wouldn't start a *remote* J, but a *local* 
one. It's only the files that are remote, the computer you're at still has to 
do all the work.

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐

On Monday, January 17th, 2022 at 6:48 PM, bill lam <[email protected]> wrote:

> Did you mean you had installed J on a windows network drive such as
>
> \\somepc\somefolder\ or it mapped as H:\ , such that the physical location
>
> of the folder is on another pc ? It maybe some windows permission security
>
> features that disallowed execution of programs on remote pc.
>
> On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 at 8:37 AM greg heil [email protected] wrote:
>
> > No
> >
> > i expect though
> >
> > that would mean the
> >
> > client would need
> >
> > to run a separate instance?
> >
> > ~greg heil
> >
> > picsrp.github.io
> >
> > i.tgu.ca/real_cal
> >
> > --
> >
> > from: Raul Miller [email protected]
> >
> > reply-to: [email protected]
> >
> > to: General forum [email protected]
> >
> > date: Jan 17, 2022, 4:24 PM
> >
> > subject: Re: [Jgeneral] networked exe's
> >
> > > I should also ask -- have you done any of J's "Socket" labs?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -------
> >
> > Raul
> >
> > .
> > -------
> >
> > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to