On Wed, 24 Mar 2004, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
No webapp would enable anybody to put a different license on the descriptor, for whatever reason he/she should choose to do so.
do you really think that will actually become an issue?
Not really. There may be the issue of "ownership", though. "I don't want anybody to modify *my* descriptor". Not in the domts case, but it could become an issue and maybe even is today.
well, that's an attitude I don't like! The gump (and wider open source) community owns gump, and that includes its descriptors. Participating in gump is participating in that community, according to our rules.
agreed?
Do you think Curt Arnold would object to moving the descriptor, for example?
I asked him where he wanted to put it. Since Curt is no Apache committer but wanted to be able to maintain it, he decided to put it on the W3C box.
which is a good reason. Once we agree on the basic principles we can figure out how to make the technology support that :D
-- cheers,
- Leo Simons
----------------------------------------------------------------------- Weblog -- http://leosimons.com/ IoC Component Glue -- http://jicarilla.org/ Articles & Opinions -- http://articles.leosimons.com/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------- "We started off trying to set up a small anarchist community, but people wouldn't obey the rules." -- Alan Bennett
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
