On Wed, 24 Mar 2004, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>> There may be the issue of "ownership", though. "I don't want >> anybody to modify *my* descriptor". Not in the domts case, but it >> could become an issue and maybe even is today. > > well, that's an attitude I don't like! Neither do I, but let's be realistic. Even inside some Apache projects you have places with "this is my code/project - ask before you touch anything" attitudes. > The gump (and wider open source) community owns gump, and that > includes its descriptors. Participating in gump is participating in > that community, according to our rules. > > agreed? Say Gump builds project A since it depends on many Apache projects and is used by many Apache projects. Do you prefer to take care of a descriptor for it not knowing anything about A or to let the people behind A maintain it? Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
