Isn't LocalCheck (the java Gump) already doing (at least locally on the gump box), but this should be extendable to do remotely. But I guess you were discussing Gumpy :).
Mvgr, Martin On Wed, 2004-03-24 at 18:12, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > Leo Simons wrote: > > > Maybe we could have an ant task that talks to the gump repository to > > keep (nay, improve on) that functionality. > > > > <project default="test"> > > <target name="verify-gump" depends="build"> > > <gump-check project="cocoon"/> > > </target> > > <target name="test" depends="build,verify-gump"> > > </target> > > </project> > > > > the gump-check task would get a list of requirements from the gump > > server (ie, what jars should exist, what directories, licenses, ...) > > and compare that info to the filesystem. It would warn the user of any > > errors. > > > > Like Ozzie, I'm just a dreamer ;) > > Let's keep dreaming. > > Gump looks closer to any port-like system that is out there for java > stuff. We happen to have a huge amount of metadata and the automatic > ability to make sure it remains in synch with it. > > it would *NOT* take much to do what leo is suggesting and solve the jar > distribution thing. > > worth thinking about! -- Mvgr, Martin --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
