Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
\
.
Ok, I think that reducing complexity is critical for wider adoption.
+1 in removal of forrest and go plain XHTML + CSS. But please, let's use a velocity-like approach, not a DOM like approach!
I am not sure how removing forrest reduces complexity. It just means we have to maintaining the template / site code ourself.
I'll certainly guilty of being away for a while, but gump.document.forrest is not a small thing, and to my eyes, not entirely obvious.
A design point for the original gump is that output was viewable as it was produced. Is this the case for gumppy w/ forrest?
- Sam Ruby
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
