I'll certainly guilty of being away for a while, but gump.document.forrest is not a small thing, and to my eyes, not entirely obvious.
... > Also, if we want both xdoc and html output we'd need to set
of tempaltes (with code in) which isn't nice.
Maybe my comment got lost... generate html and Forrest can skin that too.
In other words, Forrest can skin an html site.
So, if you make Cheetah output plain html you can see the site natively, or decide to have Forrest skin over it and publish it or use a live Forrest.
I'm -1 on removing Forrest for output, as it takes away the same visual style of the site.
IMHO making Forrest skin the html is the most reasonable way to go.
Still, I think forrest is a sticking point. I'd like a pure Python solution, and I suspect Cheetah is the best way to go.
Cheetah is IMHO the way to go for the basic html rendering.
BTW: I'm eager to see some graphics. If SVG can be written (in XML, viua Python) can Forrest convert these to images (using Batik or somethough?) I'll happily continue with Forrest if that is a good way to get images rendered.
It's there since some time now.
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
