----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Davey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Gump code and data" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 5:07 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] retire java gump
> Leo Simons wrote:
>
> > Hi gang!
> >
> > And now for something completely different...
> >
> > Saw both Adam and Stefan suggest this recently. I concur. Let's retire
> > ("kill off" sounds way to harsh for this faithful servant!) the java
> > version of gump. The python one is now superior in most ways, and Adam
> > keeps getting a headache keeping all the undocumented awkwardness in
> > sync!
>
> +0.
-0 (if that's allowed)
But -1 if the proposal is to stop non-Python Gumps at present.
>
> I'd suggest tagging CVS and making it clear that java gump may deviate
> from documentation, etc but permit changes to the code. My main concern
+1
As far as I can see, the Python Gumps are currently in the minority, so it
makes sense to allow the Java Gumps to continue.
The more, the merrier, as there's then more chance that the inevitable
installation differences will help find subtle build problems.
Also, none of the Python Gumps seem to make any generated jars available,
even if they are redistributable.
S.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
