----- Original Message ----- From: "Adam R. B. Jack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Gump code and data" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, June 18, 2004 2:49 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] retire java gump
> Sebastian, > > Any follow-up? I'd like to find a way to ensure/clarify that you aren't > a -1. Sorry for the delay in replying. The -1 was primarily intended to ensure that there would be continuing access to redistributable build outputs, which none of the Python Gump installations seem to offer at present. I'm not a -1 once that has been addressed; I just want to ensure continuity. It would also be nice if the following java Gump features were included in the Python version: - regex nags - continuous log output (I see this is being worked on) but neither of these is critical enough for a -1. My -0 was partly about diversity - different ways of building may throw up different compatibility issues - and partly about what happens to the java Gumps when the metadata changes and they stop producing much/any useful output. Again, these are not critical enough to warrant a -1. Hope that clarifies my position - if not, please ask. Sebastian --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
