On Tuesday 30 November 2004 20:18, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: > On Nov 30, 2004, at 6:19 AM, Eric Pugh wrote: > > Geir's email highlights a very clear issue with the whole > > deprecation/version cycle. He can't switch to log4j until it releases. > > They don't want to keep deprecated code around for forever. > > I'm not asking for forever. Just one version... even a short lived > one... > > My take away lesson is really more of a reaffirmation - don't depend on > outside things if you can help it...
Log4J has otherwise been very generous with having deprecated code around, but when I asked explicitly if this was a chagne for 1.3 and whether that means that everyone who uses RFA have to change the config files, I got from Ceki the answer; "Yes" to those two questions. Very strange change of attitude, and I don't know why this is happening. Cheers Niclas -- +------//-------------------+ / http://www.dpml.net / / http://niclas.hedhman.org / +------//-------------------+ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
