On Nov 30, 2004, at 8:18 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Tuesday 30 November 2004 20:18, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
On Nov 30, 2004, at 6:19 AM, Eric Pugh wrote:Geir's email highlights a very clear issue with the whole
deprecation/version cycle. He can't switch to log4j until it releases.
They don't want to keep deprecated code around for forever.
I'm not asking for forever. Just one version... even a short lived one...
My take away lesson is really more of a reaffirmation - don't depend on
outside things if you can help it...
Log4J has otherwise been very generous with having deprecated code around, but
when I asked explicitly if this was a chagne for 1.3 and whether that means
that everyone who uses RFA have to change the config files, I got from Ceki
the answer; "Yes" to those two questions.
Very strange change of attitude, and I don't know why this is happening.
Yes, historically, log4j has bent over backwards to make things easy for users.
geir
Cheers Niclas -- +------//-------------------+ / http://www.dpml.net / / http://niclas.hedhman.org / +------//-------------------+
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
