> I hadn't thought of this before, but I don't think property is (today) valid > for Maven, 'cos I think we use the id irrespective of any property name > setting there. Maybe that is something to fix, if there is utility in it. > That said, I wonder what would happen, I suspect it'd be set and passed > using build.properties just like any other property, so it might work.
I don't think this is necessary as long as the IDs are mapped correctly, so I'll remove it again. > > - is id valid for the Maven builder to depend on particular jars of a > > project? does it default to just the jar names the same as the > > project? > > I beleive so. > > Do you mean does ID default? Sorta -- we trim dates/.jar and such. > Yeah, so id = project if id is left off? In that case, I'll add an optional <gump.id>...</gump.id> property. Cheers, Brett --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
