Adam R. B. Jack wrote: > Folks, please feel free to chip in your comments/reservations and > perspectives on all of these to help Thomas decide.
I suggest trying dynagump first. If it turns out that Thomas isn't able to get productive using dynagump, that's a sign that dynagump isn't a good idea (after all we want to make it easy to do this development!) and we can take a look at some other options. Based on my understanding of Thomas' background, something servlet-based would be next up on the list. We can run that alongside dynagump as part of the same codebase (dynagump is servlet-based as well, after all), and perhaps integrate the two in some way. *I* think python is undervalued for webapp development and there's no reason it can't work well. But I also think that java is the most mature webapp technology out there and cocoon is one of the best webapp frameworks out there (despite me not having much fun using it) so it'd be insane not to try and use it. cheers, Leo --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
