On 2013-06-24, Michael Glavassevich wrote:
> Projects like Xerces and Xalan are near the bottom of the food chain. I've
> always thought the projects higher up in the stack got more value from
> Gump.
Unless Xalan or Xerces breaks something :-) In this case you get the
early warning by other project's builds failing. That's why monitoring
your dependee's builds is a crucial part of getting anything useful out
of Gump.
Shall I translate this to "we're not too eager on keeping our Gump
builds"?
> I don't remember the last time we got a notification for a legitimate
> build failure at our level. It was a rather rare occurrence, even
> while e-mail notifications were still being sent out.
Well, yes, see above. No email doesn't mean no downstream has been
broken.
Thanks
Stefan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@gump.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@gump.apache.org
