Stefan Bodewig <bode...@apache.org> wrote on 06/25/2013 03:59:56 AM: > On 2013-06-24, Michael Glavassevich wrote: > > > Projects like Xerces and Xalan are near the bottom of the food chain. I've > > always thought the projects higher up in the stack got more value from > > Gump. > > Unless Xalan or Xerces breaks something :-) In this case you get the > early warning by other project's builds failing. That's why monitoring > your dependee's builds is a crucial part of getting anything useful out > of Gump.
I don't think we ever did that. > Shall I translate this to "we're not too eager on keeping our Gump > builds"? I'd translate that to "we don't get much out of it but others might". > > I don't remember the last time we got a notification for a legitimate > > build failure at our level. It was a rather rare occurrence, even > > while e-mail notifications were still being sent out. > > Well, yes, see above. No email doesn't mean no downstream has been > broken. True, but if that occurred I'd expect the broken project (who would have been notified by Gump) would at some point open a discussion with us about the problem we caused and I don't recall the last time that happened either, if it ever did. That's more of a statement about the stability of Xerces and Xalan than anything else. The rate of change is nowhere near like it was 10 years ago. > Thanks > > Stefan > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: j-dev-unsubscr...@xerces.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: j-dev-h...@xerces.apache.org Michael Glavassevich XML Technologies and WAS Development IBM Toronto Lab E-mail: mrgla...@ca.ibm.com E-mail: mrgla...@apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@gump.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@gump.apache.org
