Doug, I don't think that's what this vote is doing. It's not giving all committers access to HDFS + MR + Common. It seems to be just making committers for Common the union of HDFS and MR.
I'm +1 on the vote. Nige On Aug 16, 2010, at 3:37 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > +1 I believe that so long as we have synchronized releases then we're > co-developing a single product and should be a single community. > > Doug > > On 08/16/2010 02:38 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: >> Since the project split, it is mostly required that any MapReduce or >> HDFS committers have access to change Common. We haven't had any cases >> where we wanted to nominate any one for just Common. Toward the goal of >> simplifying the structure, I'd propose that we define the Common >> committers as precisely the union of the HDFS committers and MapReduce >> committers. >> >> Clearly, I'm +1. >> >> -- Owen
