+1
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze <[email protected]> wrote: > It is possibly to have contributors who are only interested in RPC, > serialization, compression, etc. However, just as Owen mentioned, we don't > have > such cases yet. We might decide how to accommodate these contributors when we > have such cases. > > +1 > > Nicholas > > > > > ----- Original Message ---- >> From: Owen O'Malley <[email protected]> >> To: [email protected] >> Sent: Mon, August 16, 2010 2:38:53 PM >> Subject: [VOTE] Should we define the Common committers as HDFS + MapReduce >>committers? >> >> Since the project split, it is mostly required that any MapReduce or HDFS >>committers have access to change Common. We haven't had any cases where we >>wanted to nominate any one for just Common. Toward the goal of simplifying the >>structure, I'd propose that we define the Common committers as precisely the >>union of the HDFS committers and MapReduce committers. >> >> Clearly, I'm +1. >> >> -- Owen >> > >
