It is possibly to have contributors who are only interested in RPC, serialization, compression, etc. However, just as Owen mentioned, we don't have such cases yet. We might decide how to accommodate these contributors when we have such cases.
+1 Nicholas ----- Original Message ---- > From: Owen O'Malley <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Mon, August 16, 2010 2:38:53 PM > Subject: [VOTE] Should we define the Common committers as HDFS + MapReduce >committers? > > Since the project split, it is mostly required that any MapReduce or HDFS >committers have access to change Common. We haven't had any cases where we >wanted to nominate any one for just Common. Toward the goal of simplifying the > >structure, I'd propose that we define the Common committers as precisely the >union of the HDFS committers and MapReduce committers. > > Clearly, I'm +1. > > -- Owen >
