On 23/12/14 22:25, Ted Dunning wrote:
> I think that the time was well spent, but one of the three mentors was > total AWOL during this process. Being absent during crucial discussions If a mentor can't show up at the beginning of the project, when things are being discussed, why is s/he a mentor in the first place? I can sympathize with the mentor that starts out, genuinely useful to a podling, but after several months, suffers side-effects from life, and consequently has to limit their interaction with the podling. >it isn't politic to ask a high profile mentor to recuse themselves for lack of helping. Unless I've completely misunderstood The Apache Way, a mentor that doesn't help, and does not recuse themselves, is a mentor that is demonstrating their despoilment of The Apache Way. As such, they should be thrown off the list of mentors, regardless of the political consequences. jonathon * English - detected * English * English <javascript:void(0);>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
