On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 4:52 PM Greg Chase <gch...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > This email encrypted by tiny buttons & fat thumbs, beta voice recognition, > and autocorrect on my iPhone. > > > On Jul 1, 2016, at 1:41 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: > > > >> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 4:35 PM Tim Williams <william...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:05 PM, Marvin Humphrey <mar...@rectangular.com > > > >> wrote: > >>> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Greg Chase <g...@gregchase.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>> The branding guidelines do not address feedback such as "logo in > >> footer" or > >>>> "disclaimer is buried deep or below the fold". > >>> > >>> Incubation disclaimers are intended to be substantive. They are not > CYA > >> legal > >>> boilerplate that can be are buried in fine print. The intent is to > >> communicate > >>> (effectively!) to consumers that a project is incubating. > >> > >> I haven't heard anyone suggesting "CYA" or "buried in fine print"? > >> Most sites put notices at the bottom of a page similar to how we put > >> our equally important copyright/trademark notices at the bottom of our > >> home page. That, along with having the page saying "(Incubating)" all > >> over the place is surely enough of a notice... this "must be above the > >> fold" stuff is overreaching and encroaching on the PPMC. They have > >> the disclaimer, let's not overcome our boredom by being helicopter > >> parents... > > > > Please don't interpret the current research being done as saying that the > > logo/disclaimer has to be above the fold. There are certain ways I've > seen > > the disclaimer where its not clear how its used, or what it's related to. > > I've seen podlings use differing fonts to make it seem unimportant, and > > actually think it makes more sense in the footer. > > > > John > > > > > The observations are listed as "issues" and this is described as a > "branding audit", not a "survey." > > The meaning is clear. It's fine if you choose to redefine as a result of > feedback. >
Good point. In my mind I was treating them as findings/observations. Reworded the title. John > > > > > >> > >> --tim > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >> > >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
