Sounds just right to me. I just spend a few minutes going through incubator sites. The number of sites that had the incubator logo was definitely less in my cursory examination than the number that made it clear that they were incubating, but the number of sites that didn't make it incubation status clear was still very high.
This seems like a thing that could be cured by gentle coercion. Mentors would be a first rank for that. On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 7:32 PM, Marvin Humphrey <mar...@rectangular.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 7:06 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > As a follow up to the current discussions happening, I wanted to get > > opinions from the IPMC on whether or not the Incubator logo should be > > included in podling websites. > > Here's how I would summarize the spirit of the policy: > > 1. It should be apparent to a typical consumer that a podling is > "incubating". > 2. It should be reasonably easy to figure out what "incubating" means. > > It's my hope that any guidelines we adopt can uphold the spirit without > getting lost in overly specific details. > > I do think that including that including the Incubator logo is helpful. > However, when the logo is buried at the bottom of a long page, it does not > contribute very much. > > Marvin Humphrey > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
