On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 6:12 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> I am not opposed to Geertjan/NetBeans team refining the current list, > but please don't delay the incubation vote by doing so. Absolutely agree. > And above all please avoid giving the impression that whatever list > you come up with is complete - I'm sure you'll forget a few folks and > other folks who are on the list will end up contributing nothing, and > none of that is a problem. Definitely yes. Thanks, Gj On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 6:12 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacre...@apache.org > wrote: > On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 1:25 AM, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> > wrote: > > ...when I was a VP of Incubator a few years > > ago I had to deal with a formal escalation brought to the ASF level > > by somebody who felt unduly left out of that initial list of > committers... > > The way I would deal with the is politely explain how people can > become committers once incubation starts, and don't go any further. > > I am strongly opposed to giving more value to the initial committers > list than we have done so far, which is just an initial list that's > going to be expanded and also often reduced during incubation, > according to how people actually contribute to the project. > > A "draft list of committers and future PMC members" if you wish, nothing > more. > > I am not opposed to Geertjan/NetBeans team refining the current list, > but please don't delay the incubation vote by doing so. > > And above all please avoid giving the impression that whatever list > you come up with is complete - I'm sure you'll forget a few folks and > other folks who are on the list will end up contributing nothing, and > none of that is a problem. > > -Bertrand > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
