Thanks for your advice. On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 6:42 PM PJ Fanning <fannin...@apache.org> wrote:
> Something like that would work. This change does not need to block > this RC vote but I think it would be better if future RC archives had > a structure like this. > > The highest priority now though is to cancel the incubator vote and to > concentrate on starting a discussion thread on d...@answer.apache.org. > Generally, releases start with a discussion thread and then a vote and > later, result. Then you can move to starting a vote thread on > general@incubator.apache.org. > > On Wed, 15 Nov 2023 at 11:28, LinkinStar <linkins...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > Hi PJ, > > > > I just want to make sure. According to your description, the final bin > tar.gz should contain something like the following format right? > > > > apache-answer-1.2.0/ (everything are in this folder) > > ├── DISCLAIMER (text) > > ├── LICENSE (text) > > ├── NOTICE (text) > > ├── answer (binary) > > └── licenses (directory) > > > > Thanks, > > LinkinStar > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 6:12 PM PJ Fanning <fannin...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> Hi LinkinStar, > >> > >> Could you also review what I sent in > >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/rklvd9vsm7q64l21n045k8ffh4lc622s ? I > >> didn't include you in the send list for that mail. > >> > >> And a further request, could you modify the directory format of the > >> bin tar.gz files. I would suggest that there should be a top level > >> directory. At the moment, the files are in this format. > >> > >> DISCLAIMER > >> LICENSE > >> NOTICE > >> answer > >> licenses > >> > >> The top 3 are text files and answer and licenses are directories. It > >> might be tidier to put everything in the answer folder. Would it be > >> feasible to add the `apache` to the name? And the version number (eg > >> 1.2.0). > >> > >> > >> On Wed, 15 Nov 2023 at 10:22, LinkinStar <linkins...@apache.org> wrote: > >> > > >> > Hi PJ, > >> > > >> > Thank you very much for your suggestion. I'll rename the directory to > >> > 1.2.0-incubating-RC1 and use v1.2.0-RC1 tag. > >> > > >> > Thanks, > >> > LinkinStar > >> > > >> > On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 5:12 PM PJ Fanning <fannin...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> > > >> > > Another issue with the email is it should include the git commit id. > >> > > Tags are good too - but tags can be moved. > >> > > This is my preference but I think it would be better if you have a > >> > > v1.2.0-RC1 tag and then add a v1.2.0 tag only when the 2 votes pass. > >> > > > >> > > On Wed, 15 Nov 2023 at 10:07, PJ Fanning <fannin...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > > Hi LinkinStar, > >> > > > > >> > > > You need to include details of the Apache Answer vote. In a quick > >> > > > search, I can find no evidence that there has been a vote on your > dev > >> > > > list. > >> > > > > >> > > > https://lists.apache.org/list.html?d...@answer.apache.org > >> > > > > >> > > > Incubator podlings need to first do a vote on their dev list and > that > >> > > > vote requires at least 3 +1s from Answer PPMC members. When that > >> > > > passes, you then must run a 2nd vote on the Incubator general > list. > >> > > > The incubator vote needs at least 3 +1s from Incubator PMC members > >> > > > (binding votes). > >> > > > > >> > > > Also, it's standard to include `-RC1` in the dist.apache.org > directory > >> > > > name. This means that if your RC1 fails, you can do an RC2. The > >> > > > filenames don't include the RC1. > >> > > > > >> > > > I would suggest renaming the directory to > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/answer/1.2.0-incubating-RC1/ > >> > > > > >> > > > When the votes pass you can move this to > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/answer/1.2.0-incubating/ > >> > > > > >> > > > Regards, > >> > > > PJ > >> > > > > >> > > > On Wed, 15 Nov 2023 at 09:51, LinkinStar <linkins...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Hello, > >> > > > > > >> > > > > This is a call for vote to release Apache Answer(Incubating) > >> > > version > >> > > > > v1.2.0. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > The release candidates: > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/answer/1.2.0-incubating/ > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Release notes: > >> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-answer/releases/tag/v1.2.0 > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Git tag for the release: > >> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-answer/releases/tag/v1.2.0 > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Keys to verify the Release Candidate: > >> > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/answer/KEYS > >> > > > > > >> > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the > necessary > >> > > > > number of votes are reached. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Please vote accordingly: > >> > > > > > >> > > > > [ ] +1 approve > >> > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion > >> > > > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Checklist for reference: > >> > > > > > >> > > > > [ ] Download links are valid. > >> > > > > [ ] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid. > >> > > > > [ ] Source code distributions have correct names matching > the > >> > > current > >> > > > > release. > >> > > > > [ ] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each Answer > repo. > >> > > > > [ ] All files have license headers if necessary. > >> > > > > [ ] No unlicensed compiled archives bundled in source > archive. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Thanks, > >> > > > > LinkinStar > >> > > > >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >> > > > >> > > >
