> So, two things here: the license files need to state what is contained in the > source release, external dependencies are mostly irrelevant, but if 3rd party > code is in the source artifact, it needs to be mentioned in the license file. > The notice file is generally for items not mentioned in the license file and > is unrelated to licensing. See [1].
Does it mean that as long as we use the external dependencies (rust crates, java libs etc.) in our source code (referenced by the projects), without actually embedding directly to repository some 3rd party source code, there's no need in our cases for these additional license files, and we can remove the current ./licenses directory? All the other remarks we've already fixed. Should we now proceed to rc2 artifact, start the new voting (phase 1), and then once passed, initiate once again the voting (phase 2) on general incubator list? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
