... and Sheng Wu's +1 binding. You can resend an email with the corrected result.
Best, tison. tison <[email protected]> 于2026年8月18日周二 21:50写道: > A minor comment, you miss to count Orthur Black <[email protected]>'s +1 > non-binding. > > > Best, > tison. > > > Twice <[email protected]> 于2026年8月18日周二 21:46写道: > >> This vote has now passed with 5 +1 binding votes and 2 +1 non-binding >> votes. >> >> +1 binding: >> Xuanwo >> tison >> hulk >> Alin Jerpelea >> Twice >> >> +1 non-binding: >> mingcheng >> Lok Andy >> >> Best, >> Twice >> >> On Tue, Aug 18, 2026 at 9:42 PM Twice <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > Ahh also with my own +1. 😝 >> > >> > On Tue, Aug 18, 2026 at 9:34 PM Twice <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > >> > > Thank you all! I'll announce the result soon. >> > > >> > > Best, >> > > Twice >> > > >> > > On Mon, Aug 17, 2026 at 2:15 PM Alin Jerpelea <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > > > >> > > > +1 binding >> > > > >> > > > Best regards >> > > > Alin J >> > > > >> > > > On Mon, 17 Aug 2026, 03:54 hulk, <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > +1 binding >> > > > > >> > > > > On Mon, 17 Aug 2026 at 00:31, Orthur Black <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > > > > > >> > > > > > +1 (non-binding) >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > On Fri, Aug 14, 2026 at 10:45 AM Xuanwo <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > +1 binding >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 14, 2026, at 22:41, tison wrote: >> > > > > > > > My +1 binding >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> First, Initial Source said "The crate will retain its >> name", which >> > > > > > > >> reads ambiguously now that the rebrand to `asyncband` is >> done. Given >> > > > > > > >> that `mea` has 5M+ downloads and existing downstream users >> pinning >> > > > > it, >> > > > > > > >> it would help to write down the plan: deprecate it, keep >> publishing >> > > > > > > >> pointer releases to the new crate, yank it, or something >> else... and >> > > > > > > >> who ends up owning that name. >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > The rebrand has been done at [1]. The proposed PPMC would >> reach out >> > > > > to >> > > > > > > all >> > > > > > > > downstream projects and help them to migrate to the new >> asyncband >> > > > > crate. >> > > > > > > > The plan has been answered here and it's quite >> straightforward. I >> > > > > don't >> > > > > > > > think we should spend time on writing it down but instead >> working on >> > > > > the >> > > > > > > > concrete migration work. >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > You may help in opendal's migration from mea 0.6.7 to >> asyncband 0.6.7 >> > > > > > > since >> > > > > > > > they are logically identical. >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > [1] https://github.com/fast/asyncband/pull/149 >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> Second, Documentation still points at https://docs.rs/mea; >> should >> > > > > be >> > > > > > > >> https://docs.rs/asyncband, and community also links to >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Where do you find a pointer to https://docs.rs/mea? You >> may find it >> > > > > is >> > > > > > > "The >> > > > > > > > API documentation of Asyncband is hosted at >> > > > > https://docs.rs/asyncband" >> > > > > > > on >> > > > > > > > the proposal now. >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> https://crates.io/crates/asyncband/reverse_dependencies. >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > I kept https://crates.io/crates/mea/reverse_dependencies >> because it >> > > > > > > shows >> > > > > > > > the current downstream status. The migration to asyncband >> has been >> > > > > under >> > > > > > > > processed. This should be the proper intermediate >> representation. >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> Third, Git Repositories has the gitbox URL as >> > > > > > > >> https://gitbox.apache.org/asf/repos/asyncband , the usual >> form is >> > > > > > > >> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/asyncband.git >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Updated. >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> Lastly, contributor counts don't line up: The background >> says "four >> > > > > > > >> active contributors", Community says "Contributors: 9", >> and Core >> > > > > > > >> Developers names four people. Worth aligning so the >> numbers tell one >> > > > > > > >> story. >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Take Apache Answer you serve as a PMC member as an example. >> Answer >> > > > > has >> > > > > > > 111 >> > > > > > > > contributors on the GitHub contributor graph [2] and now >> includes 18 >> > > > > > > > committers and a PMC of 14 members. Why do you think these >> numbers >> > > > > should >> > > > > > > > be aligned? It is a common community status. >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > [2] >> https://github.com/apache/answer/graphs/contributors?all=1 >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > If you really want a concrete explanation: The other 5 >> contributors >> > > > > make >> > > > > > > > 1~2 commits randomly. Andy has one commit from the Git >> history, but >> > > > > he >> > > > > > > > spent adequate time in design discussion and review. I >> count on him >> > > > > for >> > > > > > > > several significant decisions. >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Best, >> > > > > > > > tison. >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > mingcheng <[email protected]> 于2026年8月14日周五 22:11写道: >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> +1 (non-binding) >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> The project is well discussed and addressed the naming >> concern, so >> > > > > I'm >> > > > > > > >> in favour of accepting it. A few things worth fixing >> during or right >> > > > > > > >> after the vote which none of them were blocking: >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> > Right now, we have four active contributors and the >> crate has been >> > > > > > > >> downloaded more than 5M times. >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> First, Initial Source said "The crate will retain its >> name", which >> > > > > > > >> reads ambiguously now that the rebrand to `asyncband` is >> done. Given >> > > > > > > >> that `mea` has 5M+ downloads and existing downstream users >> pinning >> > > > > it, >> > > > > > > >> it would help to write down the plan: deprecate it, keep >> publishing >> > > > > > > >> pointer releases to the new crate, yank it, or something >> else... and >> > > > > > > >> who ends up owning that name. >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> Second, Documentation still points at https://docs.rs/mea; >> should >> > > > > be >> > > > > > > >> https://docs.rs/asyncband, and community also links to >> > > > > > > >> https://crates.io/crates/asyncband/reverse_dependencies. >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> Third, Git Repositories has the gitbox URL as >> > > > > > > >> https://gitbox.apache.org/asf/repos/asyncband , the usual >> form is >> > > > > > > >> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/asyncband.git >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> Lastly, contributor counts don't line up: The background >> says "four >> > > > > > > >> active contributors", Community says "Contributors: 9", >> and Core >> > > > > > > >> Developers names four people. Worth aligning so the >> numbers tell one >> > > > > > > >> story. >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> Best, >> > > > > > > >> mingcheng >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> On Fri, Aug 14, 2026 at 8:16 PM Twice <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > Hi everyone, >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > Following the discussion thread >> > > > > > > >> > ( >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/f31qd3jm3odomjwy3lqkk21coyqsr9xs), >> > > > > I >> > > > > > > >> > call for a formal vote to accept Asyncband into the >> Apache >> > > > > Incubator. >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > As a reminder, the Asyncband proposal is here: >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> > > > > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/spaces/INCUBATOR/pages/446071349/Asyncband+Proposal >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > Please cast your vote: >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > [ ] +1, Accept Asyncband into the Apache Incubator >> > > > > > > >> > [ ] 0, I don't care >> > > > > > > >> > [ ] -1, Do not accept Asyncband into the Apache >> Incubator, >> > > > > because ... >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, and >> only votes >> > > > > from >> > > > > > > >> > the Incubator PMC members are binding. Votes from >> everyone are >> > > > > > > >> > welcome. >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > Thanks! >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > Best wishes, >> > > > > > > >> > Twice >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > > > > > > >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: >> [email protected] >> > > > > > > >> > For additional commands, e-mail: >> > > > > [email protected] >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > -- >> > > > > > > Xuanwo >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > https://xuanwo.io/ >> > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > -- >> > > > > Best Regards, >> > > > > - Hulk Lin >> > > > > >> > > > > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: >> [email protected] >> > > > > >> > > > > >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >>
