... and Sheng Wu's +1 binding.

You can resend an email with the corrected result.

Best,
tison.


tison <[email protected]> 于2026年8月18日周二 21:50写道:

> A minor comment, you miss to count Orthur Black <[email protected]>'s +1
> non-binding.
>
>
> Best,
> tison.
>
>
> Twice <[email protected]> 于2026年8月18日周二 21:46写道:
>
>> This vote has now passed with 5 +1 binding votes and 2 +1 non-binding
>> votes.
>>
>> +1 binding:
>> Xuanwo
>> tison
>> hulk
>> Alin Jerpelea
>> Twice
>>
>> +1 non-binding:
>> mingcheng
>> Lok Andy
>>
>> Best,
>> Twice
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 18, 2026 at 9:42 PM Twice <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > Ahh also with my own +1. 😝
>> >
>> > On Tue, Aug 18, 2026 at 9:34 PM Twice <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Thank you all! I'll announce the result soon.
>> > >
>> > > Best,
>> > > Twice
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, Aug 17, 2026 at 2:15 PM Alin Jerpelea <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > +1 binding
>> > > >
>> > > > Best regards
>> > > > Alin J
>> > > >
>> > > > On Mon, 17 Aug 2026, 03:54 hulk, <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > +1 binding
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Mon, 17 Aug 2026 at 00:31, Orthur Black <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > On Fri, Aug 14, 2026 at 10:45 AM Xuanwo <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > +1 binding
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 14, 2026, at 22:41, tison wrote:
>> > > > > > > > My +1 binding
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> First, Initial Source said "The crate will retain its
>> name", which
>> > > > > > > >> reads ambiguously now that the rebrand to `asyncband` is
>> done. Given
>> > > > > > > >> that `mea` has 5M+ downloads and existing downstream users
>> pinning
>> > > > > it,
>> > > > > > > >> it would help to write down the plan: deprecate it, keep
>> publishing
>> > > > > > > >> pointer releases to the new crate, yank it, or something
>> else... and
>> > > > > > > >> who ends up owning that name.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > The rebrand has been done at [1]. The proposed PPMC would
>> reach out
>> > > > > to
>> > > > > > > all
>> > > > > > > > downstream projects and help them to migrate to the new
>> asyncband
>> > > > > crate.
>> > > > > > > > The plan has been answered here and it's quite
>> straightforward. I
>> > > > > don't
>> > > > > > > > think we should spend time on writing it down but instead
>> working on
>> > > > > the
>> > > > > > > > concrete migration work.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > You may help in opendal's migration from mea 0.6.7 to
>> asyncband 0.6.7
>> > > > > > > since
>> > > > > > > > they are logically identical.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > [1] https://github.com/fast/asyncband/pull/149
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> Second, Documentation still points at https://docs.rs/mea;
>> should
>> > > > > be
>> > > > > > > >> https://docs.rs/asyncband, and community also links to
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Where do you find a pointer to https://docs.rs/mea? You
>> may find it
>> > > > > is
>> > > > > > > "The
>> > > > > > > > API documentation of Asyncband is hosted at
>> > > > > https://docs.rs/asyncband";
>> > > > > > > on
>> > > > > > > > the proposal now.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> https://crates.io/crates/asyncband/reverse_dependencies.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > I kept https://crates.io/crates/mea/reverse_dependencies
>> because it
>> > > > > > > shows
>> > > > > > > > the current downstream status. The migration to asyncband
>> has been
>> > > > > under
>> > > > > > > > processed. This should be the proper intermediate
>> representation.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> Third, Git Repositories has the gitbox URL as
>> > > > > > > >> https://gitbox.apache.org/asf/repos/asyncband , the usual
>> form is
>> > > > > > > >> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/asyncband.git
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Updated.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> Lastly, contributor counts don't line up: The background
>> says "four
>> > > > > > > >> active contributors", Community says "Contributors: 9",
>> and Core
>> > > > > > > >> Developers names four people. Worth aligning so the
>> numbers tell one
>> > > > > > > >> story.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Take Apache Answer you serve as a PMC member as an example.
>> Answer
>> > > > > has
>> > > > > > > 111
>> > > > > > > > contributors on the GitHub contributor graph [2] and now
>> includes 18
>> > > > > > > > committers and a PMC of 14 members. Why do you think these
>> numbers
>> > > > > should
>> > > > > > > > be aligned? It is a common community status.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > [2]
>> https://github.com/apache/answer/graphs/contributors?all=1
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > If you really want a concrete explanation: The other 5
>> contributors
>> > > > > make
>> > > > > > > > 1~2 commits randomly. Andy has one commit from the Git
>> history, but
>> > > > > he
>> > > > > > > > spent adequate time in design discussion and review. I
>> count on him
>> > > > > for
>> > > > > > > > several significant decisions.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Best,
>> > > > > > > > tison.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > mingcheng <[email protected]> 于2026年8月14日周五 22:11写道:
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> +1 (non-binding)
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >> The project is well discussed and addressed the naming
>> concern, so
>> > > > > I'm
>> > > > > > > >> in favour of accepting it. A few things worth fixing
>> during or right
>> > > > > > > >> after the vote which none of them were blocking:
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >> > Right now, we have four active contributors and the
>> crate has been
>> > > > > > > >> downloaded more than 5M times.
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >> First, Initial Source said "The crate will retain its
>> name", which
>> > > > > > > >> reads ambiguously now that the rebrand to `asyncband` is
>> done. Given
>> > > > > > > >> that `mea` has 5M+ downloads and existing downstream users
>> pinning
>> > > > > it,
>> > > > > > > >> it would help to write down the plan: deprecate it, keep
>> publishing
>> > > > > > > >> pointer releases to the new crate, yank it, or something
>> else... and
>> > > > > > > >> who ends up owning that name.
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >> Second, Documentation still points at https://docs.rs/mea;
>> should
>> > > > > be
>> > > > > > > >> https://docs.rs/asyncband, and community also links to
>> > > > > > > >> https://crates.io/crates/asyncband/reverse_dependencies.
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >> Third, Git Repositories has the gitbox URL as
>> > > > > > > >> https://gitbox.apache.org/asf/repos/asyncband , the usual
>> form is
>> > > > > > > >> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/asyncband.git
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >> Lastly, contributor counts don't line up: The background
>> says "four
>> > > > > > > >> active contributors", Community says "Contributors: 9",
>> and Core
>> > > > > > > >> Developers names four people. Worth aligning so the
>> numbers tell one
>> > > > > > > >> story.
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >> Best,
>> > > > > > > >> mingcheng
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >> On Fri, Aug 14, 2026 at 8:16 PM Twice <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > > >> > Hi everyone,
>> > > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > > >> > Following the discussion thread
>> > > > > > > >> > (
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/f31qd3jm3odomjwy3lqkk21coyqsr9xs),
>> > > > > I
>> > > > > > > >> > call for a formal vote to accept Asyncband into the
>> Apache
>> > > > > Incubator.
>> > > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > > >> > As a reminder, the Asyncband proposal is here:
>> > > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/spaces/INCUBATOR/pages/446071349/Asyncband+Proposal
>> > > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > > >> > Please cast your vote:
>> > > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > > >> > [ ] +1, Accept Asyncband into the Apache Incubator
>> > > > > > > >> > [ ] 0, I don't care
>> > > > > > > >> > [ ] -1, Do not accept Asyncband into the Apache
>> Incubator,
>> > > > > because ...
>> > > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > > >> > The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, and
>> only votes
>> > > > > from
>> > > > > > > >> > the Incubator PMC members are binding. Votes from
>> everyone are
>> > > > > > > >> > welcome.
>> > > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > > >> > Thanks!
>> > > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > > >> > Best wishes,
>> > > > > > > >> > Twice
>> > > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > > >> >
>> > > > >
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > > > > > >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> [email protected]
>> > > > > > > >> > For additional commands, e-mail:
>> > > > > [email protected]
>> > > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > --
>> > > > > > > Xuanwo
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > https://xuanwo.io/
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > --
>> > > > > Best Regards,
>> > > > > - Hulk Lin
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
>> [email protected]
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>
>>

Reply via email to